That's What They Say http://michiganradio.org en 'A' vs. 'An' is rather simple, unless you're talking unicorns http://michiganradio.org/post/vs-rather-simple-unless-youre-talking-unicorns <p></p><p>Do you say “<em>a</em> historical event,” or “<em>an </em>historical event?”</p><p>On this week’s edition of “That’s What They Say,” Professor Anne Curzan of the University of Michigan and host Rina Miller discuss this confusing speech convention. As Professor Curzan points out, the inclination to use either “a” or “an” depends on the pronunciation of the “h” at the beginning of “historical.”</p><p>“Most American English speakers pronounce ‘h,’” says Curzan. “We’re not ‘h-droppers.’ In Britain a lot of the urban varieties of British English drop the ‘h,’ even in words like <em>house</em> you get <em>ouse</em>. But at the beginning of words in American English we tend to pronounce the ‘h’… so we’ll say <em>a history</em>.”</p><p>The issue when pronouncing <em>historical</em>, however, is that the stress has moved to the second syllable. This makes for a lighter-sounding “h,” and can change the article of the word.</p><p>“For speakers with a lightly pronounced ‘h,’ they will say ‘<em>an </em>historical,’” says Curzan. “It may be seen as a more proper pronunciation.”</p><p> Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:55:00 +0000 Michigan Radio Newsroom and Austin Davis 12993 at http://michiganradio.org 'A' vs. 'An' is rather simple, unless you're talking unicorns How many syllables are in the word 'interesting'? http://michiganradio.org/post/how-many-syllables-are-word-interesting <p></p><p>It’s very interesting to consider some people add an extra syllable to certain words when speaking.</p><p>On this week’s edition of “That’s What They Say,” host Rina Miller and University of Michigan Professor Anne Curzan discuss how this difference in pronunciation is fairly new - linguistically speaking.</p><p>The word "interesting" is pronounced today with either three or four syllables. Anne Curzan explains the four syllable pronunciation, which often annoys the three-syllable camp, is actually the more traditional pronunciation.</p><p>“If you look in the online Oxford English Dictionary…it only has a four syllable pronunciation. If you look in modern standard dictionaries from the last ten years, they will show multiple pronunciations, three and four syllables," says Curzan.</p><p>The process of losing a syllable is not rare &nbsp;in the English language.</p><p> Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:57:00 +0000 Michigan Radio Newsroom 12923 at http://michiganradio.org How many syllables are in the word 'interesting'? There's no quelling semantic change http://michiganradio.org/post/theres-no-quelling-semantic-change <p></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.5;">Don’t get too flattered if an admirer calls you unique. In today’s spoken language unique doesn’t mean one of a kind at all. </span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.5;">On this week’s edition of “That’s What They Say,” host </span>Rina<span style="line-height: 1.5;"> Miller and University of Michigan Professor Anne </span>Curzan<span style="line-height: 1.5;"> discuss the semantic changes that strengthen or weaken the meaning of words.</span></p><p>Anne Curzan points out the strength of unique has weakened over time so that one object can be <em>more </em>unique than another.</p><p>“For most of its history in English unique has meant one of a kind, or having no peer...if&nbsp;you listen to actual usage, you’ll hear people say that something is <em>more</em> unique than something else, or <em>really </em>unique…at this point for a lot of speakers, unique means unusual<em>,"&nbsp;</em><span style="line-height: 1.5;">says&nbsp;</span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">Curzan</span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">.</span></p><p>The word unique is not unique in the weakening of its definition over time. Curzan explains that the word “quell” has also undergone significant semantic change.</p><p> Sun, 02 Jun 2013 12:41:00 +0000 Michigan Radio Newsroom 12811 at http://michiganradio.org There's no quelling semantic change Dust kittens, woofinpoofs or frog hair? http://michiganradio.org/post/dust-kittens-woofinpoofs-or-frog-hair <p></p><p>On this week’s edition of “That’s What They Say,” host Rina Miller and University of Michigan Professor Anne Curzan&nbsp;revisit regional variations in spoken English and offer up even more fun and often puzzling&nbsp;expressions.&nbsp;</p><p><span style="line-height: 1.5;">“For people who are from parts of New York or New Jersey, they will stand </span><em style="line-height: 1.5;">on line</em><span style="line-height: 1.5;"> rather than </span><em style="line-height: 1.5;">in line...</em><span style="line-height: 1.5;">and for the people who say that makes no sense, the answer is that prepositions don’t always make sense and this is just regional variation,"&nbsp;</span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">says&nbsp;</span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">Curzan</span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">.</span></p><p>Another expression that may not make sense to most of us is: <em>drinking a cabinet.</em></p><p>“If you’re from Rhode Island&nbsp;you can drink a cabinet…in Rhode Island, a cabinet is a milkshake,"<span style="line-height: 1.5;">&nbsp;</span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">Curzan</span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">&nbsp;explains.</span></p><p>Okay, so what to you call those&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.5;">balls of dust hiding underneath the bed? Dust bunnies or woofinpoofs?</span></p><p><span style="line-height: 1.5;">The </span><a href="http://dare.wisc.edu/" style="line-height: 1.5;"><em>Dictionary of American Regional English (DARE)</em></a><span style="line-height: 1.5;">&nbsp; has documented over 170 different variations for those balls of lint. And, some</span><span style="line-height: 1.5;">&nbsp;variations take on hilarious names.</span></p><p> Sun, 26 May 2013 12:29:00 +0000 Michigan Radio Newsroom 12713 at http://michiganradio.org Dust kittens, woofinpoofs or frog hair? Unspoken grammar rules, and the fight against green squiggly lines http://michiganradio.org/post/unspoken-grammar-rules-and-fight-against-green-squiggly-lines <p></p><p>For most of us, the Microsoft Word spell checker is a godsend. It helps correct our failed attempt for spelling words like <em>vinaigrette </em>or <em>renaissance. </em></p><p>However,&nbsp;Word's&nbsp;grammar checker is a whole different story. Mostly because of that cursed green squiggly line under a word that signals we've made a grammar error. One of the most frequent and frustrating corrections involves the correct use of <em>that</em> or <em>which</em>.</p><p>University of Michigan Professor of English Anne Curzan and host Rina Miller discuss these unspoken grammar rule snafus on this edition of&nbsp; "That's What They Say."</p><p>"The grammar checker is trying to enforce a rule about <em>that</em> and <em>which</em>, which English speakers have never followed, as far as we can tell,"&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.5;">says </span>Curzan<span style="line-height: 1.5;">.</span></p><p> Sun, 19 May 2013 12:43:00 +0000 Michigan Radio Newsroom 12584 at http://michiganradio.org Unspoken grammar rules, and the fight against green squiggly lines