Ongoing Coverage:

Tagged: Proposal 5

Pages

Investigative
7:00 am
Fri November 2, 2012

Truth Squad: 'Flagrant Foul' and 'No Foul' on Prop 5 ads

Political ads are filling the airwaves, but it’s not always easy to know what is true and what is not.

Michigan Watch has teamed up with the Center for Michigan’s Truth Squad to sort it out.

Today we look at Proposal 5 ads. That’s the proposal requiring a two-thirds majority of the legislature or a vote of the people for any state tax increase.

We’re going to start out with the proponents of Proposal 5, the Michigan Alliance for Prosperity. They want you to vote ‘yes.’

Read more
Investigative
7:00 am
Wed October 31, 2012

Moroun money pushing Proposal 5, tax hike supermajority

Manuel "Matty" Moroun is also behind the effort to amend the state Constituion to require a tax hike supermajority.

It’s obvious why the Ambassador Bridge-owning Moroun family is backing Proposal 6. That’s the ballot measure that would require of vote of the people to build international crossings. It would be another step toward blocking a competing bridge Canada has offered to fund.

Read more
Politics & Government
4:50 pm
Tue October 30, 2012

Stateside: What a 2/3 majority would mean for Michigan

Credit Flickr
Proposal 5 would affect the state's ability to change its tax structure

Stateside continued exploring the proposals that Michigan voters will see on next week’s ballot.

Michigan Radio’s Lester Graham spoke with Cyndy about Proposal 5 and what it means for the state.

Where did the proposal originate?

Read more
Election 2012
4:26 pm
Thu October 25, 2012

State budget director says ballot proposals lead to uncertain credit rating

Michigan's state budget director John Nixon

The state budget director says credit agencies won’t upgrade Michigan’s rating because of proposals on the November ballot.

John Nixon today spoke alongside opponents of Proposal Five. It would require a statewide vote or two-thirds majorities of the Legislature to approve a tax increase.

But Nixon said all the initiatives cast doubt about the state’s economic future.

Read more
Election 2012
12:36 pm
Wed October 17, 2012

5 things to know about Proposal 5: Tax hike supermajority

States with supermajority requirements for tax increases. Mich. has a supermajority requirement for raising property taxes. If Proposal 5 passes, Mich. would join the states in gray with the most restrictive taxing policies.
Credit Citizens Research Council of Michigan
States with supermajority requirements for tax increases. Mich. has a supermajority requirement for raising property taxes. If Proposal 5 passes, Mich. would join the states in gray with the most restrictive taxing policies.

State legislators play the game. Michigan voters will set the rules.

The playing field for Michigan lawmakers could change significantly after Nov. 6, if voters approve any one of five constitutional amendments on the ballot.

The "bed sheet ballot" is something California voters are used to, but Michigan voters haven't seen this many proposed constitutional amendments since 1978, when voters faced 9 proposed amendments.

We're posting on all the proposals seeking to amend the Constitution.

Read more
Politics & Government
9:00 am
Sat October 13, 2012

The week in review

Credit User: David Defoe / flickr

Every Saturday Michigan Radio's Rina Miller talks with political analyst Jack Lessenberry about the week's top regional news stories. This week they talk about Proposal 5 which would require a two-thirds majority vote of the Legislature in order to raise taxes and the cost of campaigning in the state.

Politics & Government
9:56 am
Thu October 11, 2012

Commentary: Time to step up against Proposal 5 and 6?

There’s one thing that the vast majority of mainstream Republicans and Democrats agree on—Governor Rick Snyder, the man he defeated, Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero, and virtually every other elected official in the state:

Ballot Proposal 5, which would require a two-thirds vote of the legislature or a statewide vote of the people to raise any taxes, would be an absolute disaster for Michigan. It would cripple our ability to change with the times, respond to crises or make infrastructure improvements necessary to attract new business.

Read more

Pages