Healthier diets lower in greenhouse gas emissions
A lot of people assume a healthy diet is also good for the environment. A recently published study lends some credence to that conventional wisdom.
Researchers at the University of Michigan and Tulane University looked at a large sample of Americans and what they said they ate. Researchers then looked at the nutritional value of that food. Finally, they looked and how much those foods emit greenhouse gases as they were produced on the farm.
Martin Heller with the University of Michigan is one of the co-authors of the study released in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
“What we found is that indeed there is a correlation that diets in the U.S. that are lower in carbon footprint tend to be a bit more healthy, tend to have higher dietary quality than the diets that have a high carbon footprint,” Heller explained.
Diets high in red meat, dairy, and solid fats had the largest carbon footprints. That’s, in part, because of the digestive systems of animals such as cattle.
“The biology that allows them to eat grass also produces methane as a by-product which is a powerful greenhouse gas emission, 25 times that of carbon dioxide and is what really hits beef and other ruminant animals hard in the carbon footprint standpoint,” he said.
People concerned about their impacts on climate change have long felt the food they choose has a connection to climate change.
Joel Panozzo and Phillis Engelbert co-own the Lunch Room Diner and Canteen and the Detroit Street Filling Station. Both are vegan restaurants. They often get customers from the nearby Ann Arbor Farmers Market.
“They’re immediately shopping at the farmers’ market and when they’re holding their giant bag of groceries and they’re walking in here, I think that’s when they’re connecting the two. It’s like, I just bought this from the farmer that has the farm 20 miles down the road. And then, I think, that’s the moment when they ask, ‘Where are you getting your food,'” Panozzo said.
The researchers looked at the carbon footprint of products on the farm. But, Panozzo says people also want to know whether the food they eat is being trucked across the country.
“Folks are considering all the resources that have to go into the food and when you consider meat products and other dairy products, you can start to see all the amount of all of the travelling and trucking of our agricultural items all that that goes into producing a meat or a dairy product,” he said.
We asked if we could meet with a couple of the Lunch Room’s regulars. Drew Johnson says he’s not vegan or vegetarian, but he’s added more plant-based food to his diet.
Drew Johnson: “I definitely have this daunting awareness of different ways that you can eat ethically and…”
Lester Graham: "Explain that. What do you mean ‘eat ethically’?"
DJ: “Oh, just thinking about the environmental impacts of meat. As I’m starting to think more about climate change and trying to figure out I act as an individual, knowing these things.”
A couple of tables away Meg Czerwinski was sitting with a large salad.
LG: “Looks good. What is that?”
MC: “This is ‘taco ‘bout it salad.’”
As the study’s correlation between healthier foods and low-carbon footprint was explained, she nodded. She studies and works in healthcare.
“We think a lot about the upstream effects of how the food is produced and how much carbon is emitted getting onto our plate, but there’s also the consideration of the more vegan and vegetarian diets being healthier and decreasing in healthcare carbon emitted because our healthcare system uses immense amounts of energy,” she observed.
There are a couple of caveats the researchers note: Some of the low-emission foods are not all that healthy, such as added sugars and refined grains. And while plant-based diets are considered more healthy, they can be lower in some nutrients such as iron and calcium.
Diets are complex and the researchers stress the findings are nuanced.
The one thing that was clear to Martin Heller and his colleagues:
“In general, we’re not eating very healthfully here in the U.S. There certainly are opportunities for us to both improve the nutritional health of our diet along with reducing the environmental impact associated with providing that diet,” Heller said.
A companion study to this one found 20 percent of Americans account for almost half of the diet-related greenhouse gas emissions.